(click
here to return to the table of contents)
Korea's
Economy Comes Full Circle: From Domestic Demand Back to Exports
By
Caroline Cooper, Director of Congressional Affairs and Trade Policy
at the Korea Economic Institute (KEI) in Washington
Visitors
to Korea over the past year have witnessed a new phenomenon there
- a surge in domestic demand. Domestic demand, rather than exports,
sustained the Korean economy during the worst of the global economic
downturn last year and for the first half of this year. But that
trend is now changing. A recent Bank of Korea report shows that
domestic demand as a portion of gross domestic product (GDP) decreased
from 50.7% in the second quarter to 28.7% in the third quarter.
Exports as a percentage of GDP increased from 49.3% in the second
quarter to 71.3% in the third quarter. The return of exports as
the primary driver of Korea's economic growth brings with it new
challenges and opportunities. If trade is to sustain Korea's growth
over the long-term, new emphasis must be placed on importing and
diversifying Korea's export base.
Once Considered Bad, Consumption Proved Good for a Time
Despite the global economic downturn and a 6%+ drop in real GDP
growth from 2000 to 2001, Korea managed to experience positive growth
in 2001 and through much of this year. This was due in part to pro-growth
policies of the government and a surge in household spending. The
latter was the most surprising.
The Korean economy, which developed from a sustained high household
savings rate, saw that rate plummet as consumer spending and credit
card usage increased. The Korean government encouraged credit card
use, in part according to the Ministry of Finance and Economy, "to
bring the taxable income of the high-income self-employed more into
the open."
The plan worked and brought with it a new credit culture in Korea.
The majority of banks shifted their credit provision policy away
from corporations to households. Koreans - both young and old -
easily obtained credit cards and began spending. The results were
at first positive - private consumption rose to never before seen
levels, facilities investment increased, as did domestic production.
The negative result, most evident in the past two months, read across
the headlines of major global newspapers from The Wall
Street Journal to Korean dailies such as the Chosun Ilbo:
"Credit Card Usage Out of Control."Koreans, some not yet
debt-ridden, were reported as taking on personal debt to bail out
friends in severe financial turmoil - a sign that individualistic
spending habits had taken a firm hold in Korea. According to the
Chosun Ilbo, the average credit card default ratio rose
to a record 7.3% in the third quarter.
The Financial Supervisory Service has stepped in to curb defaults,
imposing caps on cash advance limits and raising the reserve ratio
for credit provision at lending institutions. But these efforts
coincide with a sharp decline in consumption, sparking fears among
analysts that trends will worsen as the government continues its
efforts to reign in spiraling household debt. A recent Bank of Korea
report shows that the consumer goods sales index (measured year
on year) declined by 25% from the first quarter of this year to
the third quarter. According to the Samsung Economic Research Institute,
the consumer expectation index and consumer evaluation index - leading
indicators of consumer attitudes in Korea - each declined for the
fourth straight month in October.
Imports and Exports are Both Good
Korea has long been fearful of an increase in imports, and that
attitude does not appear to have changed. Higher consumption over
the past year resulted in an increase in imports - both of consumer
goods and capital goods. This precipitated a rise in import prices
and fears among experts that a further increase in imports could
threaten Korea's current account balance. According to the Bank
of Korea, this reached a surplus of $459.7 billion in September.
A primary concern has been a worsening of Korea's terms of trade.
While exports - now totaling $117 billion - continue to outpace
imports, the latter grew at a faster rate than exports from the
second quarter to the third quarter. Bank of Korea data also shows
that import prices increased at a faster rate than export prices
during the first three quarters of this year.
Analysts need not be worried. An increase in imports is positive
and normal as an economy's shift becomes more fully developed, and
production focuses more on services than manufacturing. Indeed,
the government thinks that imports are positive. In a recent op-ed
piece, Commerce, Industry, and Energy Minister Shin Kook-hwan wrote:
|
"Korea's
trade policy has stressed the export aspect of trade and overlooked
the magnitude of imports - the country should shift its trade
policy toward an integrated one balancing imports and exports.
The liberalization and expansion of imports contributes greatly
to the honing of national economic competitiveness."
|
|
Proof
that Korea's economy is changing in the right direction can be seen
in the data. Increases in imports of capital goods and raw materials
are indicative of investment by manufacturing companies. Minister
Shin argues that "cheap, but good quality, raw materials and
machinery component imports contribute to international competitiveness."
The biggest percentage changes in imports from the second to third
quarter were seen in raw materials such as iron and steel and chemicals
(35% and 77% increase month to month), and in capital goods (43%
increase), not consumer goods.
Another positive sign that Korea's economy is changing is that services
now account for a larger percentage of Korea's GDP than manufacturing.
According to the Bank of Korea, services as a percentage of GDP
increased from 55.8% in the second quarter to 64.3% in the third
quarter. Manufacturing as a percentage of GDP now accounts for only
38.7%.
Diversification Also Includes Services
In balancing its trade strategy, Korea needs to consider diversifying
its export base - common advice given by experts. Korea's top exports
are information technology goods (i.e., computers, semiconductors,
and wireless telephony) and old favorites - heavy industry goods
(i.e., autos, ships, steel, and chemicals). Diversifying this export
base should mean that Korea puts priority on increasing production
of more advanced IT goods and on opening IT service markets.
As has traditionally been the case in Korea, technology is first
developed and tested in the home market before being exported. As
the first country to commercialize Qualcomm's CDMA (code division
multiple access technology) in 1996, Korea used its domestic market
to capitalize on producing wireless handsets. These are now its
top export item. Companies such as Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics
have become world-class producers of CDMA handsets.
Korean's fascination with the Internet and limited landmass provided
it with a logical testing ground to also develop a competitive wireless
communications service industry. Capitalizing on technology already
in place from fixed line broadband, Korean wireless service providers
such as SK Telecom have developed wireless broadband products for
export. But they are not looking to develop new opportunities in
the United States, recognizing that the market there is not ripe
for investment and that the economy is still in a downturn.
SK and other Korean fixed line and wireless telecommunications service
providers are heading to China - now Korea's largest export market
(including Hong Kong) - for business opportunities. They are smart
to do so, especially as the domestic market becomes more saturated
with service options, and demand in China's nascent wireless telecommunications
industry keeps growing. Other Korean services industries would do
well to follow suit, especially finance and retail, which could
profit from increased e-commerce made available through advanced
telecommunications service delivery in China.
Caroline
Cooper is the Director of Congressional Affairs and Trade Policy
at the Korea Economic Institute (KEI) in Washington. The views expressed
here are those of the author and not KEI.
|