|
Focus:
New Policy Challenges |
JETRO,
1221 Avenue of the Americas, NYC, NY 10020December
1, 2003
|
Japan Identifies New Policy Challenges to Sustain its Economic Progress
|
The
Japanese government adopted a detailed “Action Plan for
Economic and Structural Reform” (Action Plan) in late 1996.
Substantial progress has since been achieved through corporate,
financial and consumer deregulation. Steps have also been taken
to make it easier to conduct business in Japan. In addition to
helping Japanese banks to dispose of non-performing loans, this
includes measures to create more efficient funding mechanisms,
provide additional labor flexibility, promote industrial revival,
and facilitate the growth of new businesses and entrepreneurship.
Despite many achievements, it should be understood that reform is
an ongoing process and many important challenges remain. Much of
the essential policy infrastructure has been put into place, yet
Japan’s ultimate ability to succeed will depend on its ability
to maintain consistent progress. Key issues include the need to reduce
the uncertainty that impinges upon economic growth, to help younger
people enter the workforce, and to maintain and expand the social
consensus needed to guide Japan through this essential transition.
The Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) provides the following
information, which examines these issues in greater detail.
|
Latest
Economic Data Reflects Improving Fundamentals in Japan
|
|
Data released
in Tokyo this month showed that Japan’s gross domestic product
(GDP) grew 0.6% -- an annualized rate of 2.2% in July-September --
the seventh consecutive quarterly increase. Importantly, this was primarily
driven domestically by the private sector, rather than government spending
or export growth as has been seen in the past. This is the longest
period of continual growth since 1997. Coming after second-quarter
growth of 0.9%, this data has surprised many analysts, leading many
to believe the stagnation that has been troubling the world’s
second largest economy for over a decade may now be coming to an end.
Another positive sign was the recent rise of the Japanese Ministry
of Economy, Trade and Industry's (METI) all-industry index by 2.2%
since August. This index is widely considered to be a supply-side measure
of economic growth. This improvement was much stronger increase than
the 1.2% rise expected by economists, and followed August's anemic
0.3% gain and July's 1.5% decline. The ministry's tertiary industry
index, a gauge of strength in the service sector, also rose by 2.2%
in September from August, compared with an expected 0.6% rise. The
tertiary index had fallen 0.2% in the July-September period from the
previous quarter. The tertiary index reflects activity in six industries:
utilities, transport and telecommunications, wholesale and retail,
finance and insurance, real estate and services. The all-industry index
takes a reading of activity in the six industries that comprise the
tertiary index combined with construction, agricultural and fisheries
industries, the public sector and industrial output.
One news report, analyzing this improvement, quoted Ayako Mitsui, an
economist at UBS AG in Tokyo, who stated: "On top of the further
recovery in the tertiary-industry sector expected for the coming quarters,
the manufacturing side is also turning bullish for quarter four in
its outlook for industrial production and machinery orders.”
Viewed in combination with the other improvements (see past Focus newsletters),
there is certainly reason for optimism. Positive sentiment is also
reflected in the Bank of Japan’s quarterly business confidence
survey. It provides further evidence that backs up the METI data highlighted
above, noting that large manufacturing companies are expressing a positive
outlook for the first time in eleven quarters. This improvement --
accompanied by a 13.6% April-June rise in corporate profitability --
may partially explain the rise in plant and equipment spending by 6.4%
over the same time frame.
Manufacturing companies in particular increased their plant and equipment
purchases by 28.4% on a year-over-year basis. Nippon Steel plans to
spend approximately $270 million to repair blast furnaces. Similarly
Toshiba plans to invest $300 to build a new semiconductor manufacturing
line, while Toyota is moving to invest $2.7 billion in new domestic
production facilities. Japan’s Business Outlook Survey also notes
that small and medium firms increased their plant & equipment purchases
by 17.3% on a year-over-year basis.
|
Japan Identifies New Policy Challenges
Moving Forward
|
|
After adopting
the Action Plan in late 1996 the Japanese government moved to introduce
the policy infrastructure that would serve to overcome the inefficiencies
that had been constraining growth and business activity in Japan. The
recent improvements in the Japanese economy can be seen to be the result
of these efforts. With much of the initial work in place, Japanese policymakers
have now moved on to identifying new challenges and directions to ensure
effective implementation. This will entail careful monitoring and evaluation
of financial, human resource, industrial, regulatory and corporate trends
to facilitate continual movement toward a more efficient, competitive
and investor-friendly Japan.
|
Japan
Needs to Facilitate Move to More Efficient Corporate Funding Mechanisms
|
|
Japan
is now moving away from the main bank system that helped to guide it
to prosperity for much of the post-war era. Banks and corporations
are indeed reducing the cross-shareholding structures that provided
what used to admirably be called “patient capital” to provide
additional flexibility and to restore the health of their balance sheets.
The cross shareholdings ratio, for example, has according to the NLI
Research Institute declined from 17.8% of listed shares in FY1992 to
7.4% in FY2002. That said, the move to a more efficient credit- and
capital market-oriented system still has a long way to go.
Japanese corporations still rely far more heavily on commercial banks
than their U.S. counterparts. Over 80% of small Japanese companies
and even 30% of those with over 300 employees are still required to
offer personal guarantees to secure loans. Therefore, U.S.-style credit-based
lending, which relies more heavily on corporate profitability and cash
flow remains less prevalent and collateral, largely in the form of
real estate, continues to play an extremely important role in Japanese
lending practices.
To rectify these deficiencies, METI presented a proposal at a September
9th ministerial meeting containing the following program components:
- Diversification
of financial institutions and methods
-
Amend Business Trust Law to allow public institution guarantees
of trust company loans.
- Deregulate Limited Partnership Act to facilitate business restructuring.
- Create policies to promote securitization and other new financing
methods.
- Facilitate accounts receivable financing to help small and medium
sized firms.
- Diversification
in risk management techniques
- Introduce new inventory collateral system to reduce need for
real estate-secured financings
- Improve credit risk database to facilitate loans based on cash
flow and profitability
- Improve legal framework governing personal and revolving guarantees
- Facilitate financings based on intellectual property
- Revise Bankruptcy and Civil Rehabilitation Laws to encourage
management buy-outs
|
Japan
Needs to Reduce Unemployment and Develop More Flexible Labor Practices
|
|
The
shift away from a lifetime employment system based on seniority to
one that promotes the more flexible utilization of labor has contributed
to rising unemployment – particularly among the younger people
who ultimately will determine the future of Japan.
This is a real problem, particularly if light of current demographic
trends, which are contributing to the rapid aging of Japanese society.
Combined with general anxiety over Japan’s future, older workers
are seeking to hang on to their positions. The percentage of younger
employees holding full time positions has been decreasing dramatically,
in contrast to those over 30 years of age. A similar trend can be seen
looking at the average years of continuous service at one company.
To help Japan meet these challenges, government policymakers are actively
moving forward to strengthen Japan’s social safety net, while facilitating
the entry of entry-level employees, as well as individuals in mid-career
seeking reemployment in the workforce. Their actions include:
- Promoting
Deregulation and Measures to Facilitate Mid-Career Reemployment
-
Successive revisions of Temporary Help Agent Worker Dispatch
Law in 1999 and 2003 to expand the ability of workers to accept
temporary assignments of up to three years.
- Allowing expansion of fixed-term labor contracts from one to
three years.
- Expanding ability of private employment agencies to make commission-placed
placements.
- Creating programs to facilitate skill development and training.
- Promoting
Human Resource Development Systems in the Private Sector
- Establishing industry-wide training programs. Examples include an initiative
under the Japan Industry Technology Services Association and a program
to allow manufacturing skill development under the sponsorship of local
governments.
- Creation of specialized corporate educational institutions such as Sony
University (2003), Toyota Institute (2002), NEC University (1997) and the
Hitachi Institute of Management Development (1961).
- Supporting skill development through labor unions, i.e., the Electrical
Industry Profession Academy under The Japan Electrical and Information
Union.
- Government
Support to Promote Entry of Younger People and Women in
the Workforce
- Expanding internship and work-training programs.
- Implementing trial employment programs and evaluation criteria to assist technical
placements.
- Strengthen graduate and vocational programs as well as Japanese University
system.
- Enhance employment through new businesses and start-ups.
- Facilitate labor mobility to growth sectors
- Create one-stop centers to provide counseling and training for entry- level
workers.
|
Serious
Progress is Being Achieved in the Revitalization of Japanese Industry
|
|
As
more corporate restructuring transactions are initiated to revitalize
individual Japanese firms, there has been a growing recognition
that Japan’s aggregate success will be dependent upon the
resolution of its serious non-performing loan problem.
Japan’s Resolution and Collection Corporation was established in
1998 to purchase the debt and bonds from bankrupt and sound financial
institutions. Recent data reveals the RCC has purchased over $87 billion
in troubled loans. To date, approximately $56 billion has been collected.
In cooperation with other public sector institutions such as the Development
Bank of Japan and credit guarantee corporations, the RCC has also been
active in restructuring companies from which they have purchased debt.
As of July, 150 restructuring cases are already underway.
In addition, the government-sponsored Industrial Revitalization Corporation
of Japan (IRCJ) was founded in May of this year. It was established to
purchase debt from banks and other creditors and to work with stakeholders
to establish and implement viable restructuring plans. With a capital
base of 10 trillion yen, the IRCJ will be making purchases until the
end of March 2005, and then seek to sell off these assets to new sponsors
and other investors within three years. As of the end of September, six
cases have been announced, including: Kyushu Industrial Transportation,
Dia Kensetsu, Usui Department Store, Mitsui Mining, Matsuya Denki and
Meiei Shokai.
Notable restructurings in recent years include the reorganization of
five major steel corporations into two entities that remain among the
largest in the world. Another was the creation of Renesas Technology,
a merger to rationalize semiconductor production by Hitachi and Mitsubishi
Electric. These reorganizations have greatly enhanced the renewed profitability
of these restructured enterprises. Other transactions sponsored by private
equity firms include efforts by Unison Capital, Marubeni and Bandai to
revitalize Tohato, a troubled confectionary firm. Similar deals include
Victoria, a sporting goods company by JAFCO, Fukusuke, an apparel company
by MKS Partners and Takarabune Corporation, a food company by Tokio Marine
Capital.
The success of these restructurings is also leading to major new investments
by their sponsors. Examples include a $1 billion investment in the Sharp
Kameyama flat panel TV assembly plant and a $.7 billion investment in
the Elpida Memory DRAM production facility.
|
Tax
Reform is Also Encouraging Revitalization and Investor Interest in
Japan
|
|
Since
the adoption of the Action Plan, the Japanese government has
introduced new tax policies designed to facilitate industrial
revitalization,
entrepreneurship and a more competitive business environment.
These include reducing Japan’s corporate tax rate in FY1998
and FY1999 from 37.5 to 30%, and introducing a consolidated tax
system
in FY2002.
In FY2003 large-scale policy-driven tax cuts totaled approximately
$1.6 billion. Measures include tax exemptions of 10-12% on R&D expenses
and 10% on IT investment, along with a 50% special depreciation for R&D
facilities and other qualifying assets. These achievements have helped
overall investment in R&D to increase this year by 5.5% (13.4%
for precision equipment and 10% for pharmaceuticals). IT spending has
also
increased 3.3% over the same time frame (35% in the automobile and
20% in the information processing sectors).
Other incentives include the suspension of an additional tax on retained
earnings, expanding depreciation allowances and exempting investments
into start-ups from stock transfer taxes. Estate taxes on inheritances
were also reduced from 70% to 50% and other taxes were reduced to promote
purchases of financial assets. Additional reforms planned for FY2004
in an effort to “restore a challenge-oriented society” include:
-
Extending eligibility of loss carry-forwards from 5 to 7 years.
- Abolishing the consolidated surtax.
- Reducing tax rate on capital gains from unlisted shares from 26%
to 20%.
- Expanding scope of aggregation of profits and loss through financial
taxation integration.
- Extending incentives to promote small and medium enterprise investment
through 7% tax deductions and a 30% special depreciation.
- Expanding new tax incentives governing “angel” investments
to include regional taxes.
- Enhancing and extending incentives to promote investments in new
energies and conservation.
- Strengthening and extending “green tax” system for
automobiles.
|
Cultivation
of a More Entrepreneurial Culture is Essential
|
|
During
the current difficult period of economic transition in Japan, the
number of business closures (4.5%) has exceeded the number of business
start-ups (3.1%) from 1999-2001. While this gap is an improvement
(1.4 vs 2%) from the previous 1996-1999 period, leaders have come
to recognize the important relationship between entrepreneurship
and national economic growth.
With this in mind, the Japanese government is moving to double the number
of new businesses established from 180,000 to 360,000 annually. Japan
is also seeking to establish 1,000 new university-based startups by FY2004.
To achieve these objectives, Japan is now developing the policy and funding
infrastructure that will help to facilitate the ability of potential
entrepreneurs to realize their vision.
Japan has lagged far behind the United States in the use of venture
capital. To correct this deficiency, the Japanese government has announced
a range
of tax incentives to support the development of “angel funding” as
a means to promote business start-ups. In 1997 angel investors were
allowed to deduct capital losses from their gains on a carry-forward
basis for
up to three years. In 2000, taxable capital gains for angel investments
were reduced to 25% of the real gains realized by stock transfers of
recognized venture companies. In 2003, investments in venture companies
became deductible within the current year from other stock transfers.
It is forecast these benefits would effect up to approximately 300
companies and 3,000 investors of funds totaling approximately $100
million. Additional
proposals are now under consideration that seek to relax the recognition
process and the criteria by which venture companies become eligible
for these benefits.
One other constraint on the formation of start-ups in Japan has been
the minimum capitalization requirements prescribed in its Commercial
Code. These total approximately $100,000 for a joint stock and $30,000
for a private limited company. Since February 2003, however, companies
can be established with capital as low as one yen – providing
the founders commit to investing the remaining amount of capital within
five
years of establishment. Over 7,000 applications were filed and 5,000
companies founded since this measure was enacted. These and other favorable
trends, are leading to a notable increase in angel activity, as seen
in the formation of national and local networks such as the Nippon
Angels Forum To further facilitate the ability of emerging companies
to raise
funds, several new programs have been established. These include:
- The National Life Finance Corporation began offering loans
in early 2000 of up to $50,000 to entrepreneurs planning
to start-up new businesses
or for newly established enterprises. At the end of September, 6,448
cases had been handled with loans totaling $186 million.- The Japan
Finance Corporation for Small Business began providing
financing in early 2000
to entrepreneurs who found businesses exhibiting strong growth potential.
Loans of up to $5 million are offered and no collateral is required
for up to 75% of capital borrowed. At the end of August,
802 cases had been
handled with loans totaling $300 million.
- The Shoko Chuken Bank began providing zero-collateral loans of
up to $270,000 in November 2002 to entrepreneurs who possess marketable
technologies
or business models, but only one to seven years of business experience.
At the end of August, 310 cases had been handled with loans totaling
$28 million.
Perhaps the biggest obstacle to promoting new business start-ups
in Japan is its lack of an entrepreneurial orientation. In an environment
in which
the preferred employment scenario was joining a large company or
government institution, seeking a slow advance in accordance with
ones seniority
until retirement, most Japanese people do not yet appreciate the
role entrepreneurs play in a dynamic, competitive economy.
To familiarize Japanese people with the realities of entrepreneurship
and to prepare them for the responsibilities of this career choice,
METI and other Japanese government organizations have implemented
programs
including:
- Venture Fairs: annual national events offering start-ups
and SMEs an opportunity to develop distribution channels,
partners and investors.
Since FY 2000, this event has attracted 1,000 enterprises and 70,000
attendees. More than 20% of participating companies have reported
some
measure of success in furthering their business objectives as a
result.
- Start-up Seminars: intensive training to provide the knowledge
and skills needed to start a business. From February 1999 to March
2002,
27,547 people were trained in 714 locations. Approximately 30%
went on to start an enterprise after completing their training.
- Venture Challenge Support Project: next year the Japanese government
is hoping to provide resources to help venture companies to develop
and implement the business plans needed to achieve success in their
respective
markets.
- Startup Japan! DREAM GATE Project: program launched last summer
to provide web-based business support services and internship projects.
In little over three months approximately 100,000 people have registered
with this service.
- National Forum on Entrepreneurship and Venture Business: To promote
public awareness and recognize the achievements of entrepreneurs
in Japan, symposiums have been held throughout Japan.
Six
events were
held in FY2002
attracting about 4,500 participants and awards were presented
to three entrepreneurs and three start-up supporters. Four entrepreneurs
who
were recognized in FY2000 have received the Prime Minister’s
award.
Despite recent improvements in the Japanese economy, stronger
demand is vital to maintain improving domestic growth, as well
as to reduce
Japan’s dependence on exports and to sustain the economic
recovery that now appears to be underway. Addressing the new
challenges and
directions outlined above will help to restore consumer confidence
and spending
as well as to strengthen increasing investor interest in order
to help Japan realize these important goals. |
|
For
a more detailed analysis of current Japanese policy challenges
and directions containing numerous charts and tables that depict
the data highlighted above, please click here to download a PDF presentation:
ENGLISH --- JAPANESE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data,
statistics and the reference materials presented within this newsletter
have been compiled by JETRO from
publicly-released media and research accounts. Although
these statements are believed to be reliable, JETRO does not guarantee
their accuracy, and any such information should be checked independently
by the reader before they are used to make any business or investment
decision.
|
|
For additional information,
please contact Satoshi Miyamoto, Executive Director of JETRO NY at Tel:
212-997-0416, Fax: 212-997-0464, E-mail: Satoshi_Miyamoto@jetro.go.jp
Focus:
Investment Japan IV
Focus:
Investment Japan III
Focus:
Biotechnology
Focus:
Investment
Japan II
Focus:
Investment Japan
Focus:
Foreign Direct Investment
Focus:
Mergers & Acquisitions
Focus:
Entrepeneurship
Focus:
Economic Revitalization
Focus:
Industrial Revitalization
Focus:
Foreign Investment
Focus:
Bush Visit
Focus:
Koizumi Visit
Focus:
Economic Rebirth
Focus:
Hiranuma Plan
Focus:
Foreign Direct Investment
Focus:
Emergency Economic Package
Focus: Action Plan
Focus:
Economic Reform
Focus:
Okinawa Summit
Focus:
Small Business Development
Focus: New Enterprise Development
Focus:
Industrial Revitalization
Focus: Economic Recovery 4
Focus: Steel
Focus: Economic Recovery 3
Focus:
Economic Recovery 2
Focus: Economic Recovery
|
Focus is published and
disseminated by JETRO
New York in coordination with KWR
International, Inc. JETRO
New York is registered as an agent of the Japan External Trade
Organization, Tokyo, Japan and
KWR International, Inc. is registered on behalf of JETRO
New York. This material is filed with the Department of Justice
where the required registration statement is available for public viewing.
Website content ©
2003 KWR International
|