Cleaning Up the Chinese Stock Exchange?
The issue of transparency and disclosure has been a major point of concern in any discussions about Chinas economic development. Indeed, lack of disclosure is often cited as a major risk in doing business in China. This is something that was repeatedly brought up in Beijings efforts to gain membership in the World Trade Organization. In November, the China Securities Regulatory Commission made a move to diminish some of these concerns, announcing changes in rules pertaining to delisting companies that trade on the Shanghai and Shenzen stock markets. Although there remains much to be done to improve transparency and disclosure in Chinese markets, the new measures, if implemented, will be a positive step.
Pressure
to tighten rules and regulations on Chinas stock exchanges
derived from criticism that the authorities have allowed loss-making
firms to continue trading, despite their inability to restructure
without government support. Indeed, it is acknowledged that a
number of listed companies either falsify profits or are not expected
to ever generate returns for investors. Moreover, in some cases
this has led to circumstances where investors bet heavily that
the company will be bailed out by the government, especially considering
that almost all listed firms are state-owned enterprises, a status
that provided political leverage in initially getting listed.
Consequently, political connections have at times meant more than
market realities. For a China seeking to demonstrate that it can
be a member of the WTO -- poorly working and influence-peddling
dominated stock markets are not acceptable.
The new rules will go into effect on January 1, 2002. Under the new guidelines, companies will be suspended from trading for six months as soon as they record three straight years of losses. If they fail to turn a profit during this period they can be delisted by either the Shanghai or Shenzhen exchanges. Currently there are 15 companies thought to run the risk of being put on probation for six months, while another 50 companies are thought to be questionable with a dismal track record of two years of losses.
While the move to tighten rules and regulations and standards for Chinas stock exchanges is positive, the real test comes in how rapidly the authorities will move to close companies that violate the law, either through intentional misrepresentation or just plain bad business practices. The track record is not encouraging. However, this year there were encouraging signs, as seen in the delisting of three companies, a trend which we hope will accelerate moving forward. Announcing rules and regulations is one thing, implementing is another. As China enters 2002 as a future member of the WTO, the whole world will be watching.
(click here to return to the table of contents)
Editor: Dr. Scott B. MacDonald, Sr. Consultant
Deputy Editor: Dr. Jonathan Lemco, Director and Sr. Consultant
Associate Editors: Robert Windorf, Darin Feldman
Publisher: Keith W. Rabin, President
Web Design: Michael Feldman, Sr. Consultant
Contributing Writers to this Edition: Scott B. MacDonald, Keith W. Rabin, Uwe Bott, Jonathan Lemco, Jim Johnson, Andrew Novo, Joe Moroney, Russell Smith, and Jon Hartzell
|